Back

Accurate Pitchers Move Better — And Stay Healthier

Accurate Pitchers Move Better — And Stay Healthier

We often talk about velocity, spin, or torque — but what about accuracy? In a world obsessed with metrics, command still wins, especially when it doesn’t come at the cost of arm health.

This new study used motion-capture analysis on 121 professional pitchers to explore the biomechanical differences between high-accuracy and low-accuracy throwers. The goal was simple: what do the best strike-throwers do differently?

What researchers found was that accuracy wasn’t just about “feel” or “repetition” — it was directly tied to movement efficiency and joint loading. In fact, the least accurate throwers not only missed more — they also stressed their arms more doing it.

What the Study Found

  • High-accuracy pitchers stayed significantly closer to the center of the strike zone — without sacrificing velocity.

  • Lead knee extension at ball release was significantly greater in high-accuracy pitchers, suggesting more effective lower-half engagement and ground force transfer.

  • Low-accuracy pitchers experienced:


    • Higher shoulder internal rotation torque

    • Higher elbow varus torque

    • Higher medial elbow force

  • These high-stress mechanics are consistent with elevated injury risk profiles.

  • No significant difference in pitch speed was observed between groups — showing that command and velocity aren’t mutually exclusive.

The study’s design relied on a large sample of pro pitchers and compared biomechanics between high-accuracy and low-accuracy groups, as determined by measured distance from zone center. All data was collected using marker-based motion capture and force platforms in a controlled indoor setting.

Why This Matters

We’ve long assumed that efficient movers throw more strikes. This study confirms it — and adds objective kinetic data to back it up.

But it also introduces a critical new idea: accuracy may be protective.

Low-accuracy throwers produced higher shoulder and elbow torques, especially in the varus and internal rotation directions — patterns strongly linked to injury. So, while command may seem like a skill or a trait, it might also be a biomechanical output — a reflection of how well a pitcher moves, sequences, and transfers energy.

The fact that velocity didn’t drop off in the high-accuracy group is even more important. It means pitchers don’t have to choose between throwing hard and throwing strikes — they just have to move better.

Still, this was a lab study. We don’t know how these findings hold up in-game under pressure, fatigue, or after a full workload. And while the mechanics of less accurate pitchers were more stressful, we don’t yet know how that translates to actual injury rates.

How We Apply This at VeloU

At VeloU, command isn’t trained in isolation — it’s trained through movement.

This study validates our approach of starting with efficient sequencing, energy transfer, and lower-half control before layering in pitch shaping or command targets. Pitchers who don’t sequence well often struggle with command and create excess torque — exactly what this research found.

We also prioritize lead leg blocking and force application during ball release. The data on lead knee extension tracks perfectly with what we monitor daily: better front leg mechanics lead to better timing and more consistent release points.

Lastly, we use this kind of data to challenge the outdated assumption that velocity has to cost control or health. The best arms we’ve worked with are the ones that do both — and do it cleanly.

This article is part of Applied Baseball Science by Dr. Nicholas Serio, where we break down the biomechanics, performance science, and injury research shaping the modern game. Powered by VeloU (Velo University) — where research meets real-world baseball.

Reference

Matsuo, T., Ohya, T., Tanaka, Y., Kinoshita, T., Sogabe, A., & Takahashi, K. (2024). Kinematic and kinetic comparison between high-accuracy and low-accuracy pitchers in professional baseball. Journal of Biomechanics, 165, 111678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.111678